Arthur Labinjo-Hughes 'knew his dad was going to kill him'

A six-year-old boy was fearful his father would kill him months before his death, a court has heard.

Thomas Hughes and partner Emma Tustin are on trial accused of murdering his son Arthur Labinjo-Hughes last June.

In a closing speech at Coventry Crown Court, Ms Tustin's defence said the boy was routinely assaulted by Mr Hughes at their Solihull home and had told others his "dad was going to kill him".

Both of the accused, who deny murder, also face child cruelty allegations.

Arthur died after sustaining an "unsurvivable" head injury on 16 June 2020 while in the sole care of Ms Tustin at her home on Cranmore Road in Shirley, Solihull.

Despite medical evidence suggesting there was no way Arthur could have self-inflicted his fatal injuries, Ms Tustin, 32, maintained she was not responsible.

She has pleaded guilty to two counts of child cruelty which accused her of intimidation and assaults. She denies a third count alleging she poisoned Arthur with salt-laced drinks and meals.

Representing her, Mary Prior told the court "she let that little boy suffer and she accepts that, and she will pay a heavy price for that".

Closing her case, Ms Prior said the defendant had been painted as manipulative. She said Arthur had been struggling after his biological mother was jailed for a killing in 2019, and was said to be anxious, clingy and experiencing nightmares.

Ms Prior added Mr Hughes, 29, ignored advice from doctors and Arthur's school not to punish him and to treat him with kindness and understanding but he did not share this advice with Ms Tustin.

Since he was five - before Mr Hughes and Ms Tustin struck up a relationship - Arthur had expressed concerns his father was going to kill him, Ms Prior told the court. She said the boy had expressed this to his wider family, his doctor and his school "for well over a year and nobody listened".

The court previously heard Mr Hughes made a number of threats towards his son, including to "put him six feet under", and had also sent Ms Tustin messages such as "just end him".

Although he was not present for the alleged fatal assault on Arthur, prosecutors argue Mr Hughes is equally culpable as he "encouraged" violence against his son, as well as dealing out beatings himself.

Mr Hughes faces the same child cruelty counts as his co-defendant. Despite his not-guilty pleas, his counsel said he was "not suggesting for a second he's anything other than guilty" for the counts relating to intimidation and assault.

His defence argued Ms Tustin carried out assaults on Arthur in secret from Mr Hughes; assaults which escalated towards the end of Arthur's life.

Bernard Richmond told jurors Ms Tustin was "a predator" and Arthur her prey, "because he had something she wanted - Thomas Hughes".

He said she drove a wedge between Mr Hughes and Arthur and would "bombard" him with messages about the child's alleged behaviour.

Mr Richmond said Mr Hughes was "stupid" but not a murderer. There was "nothing to suggest" he had given Ms Tustin permission to harm his son, Mr Richmond added.

The trial continues.

If you have been affected by the issues raised in this article, help and support is available via BBC Action Line.

Follow BBC West Midlands on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram. Send your story ideas to: [email protected]