Diana documentary: What the critics said

VINCENT AMALVY/AFP/Getty Images Princess Diana in Paris, 1992VINCENT AMALVY/AFP/Getty Images
The documentary is Channel 4's highest rating overnight programme of the year

Channel 4's documentary about the late Diana, Princess of Wales has been met with both criticism and praise.

It featured Diana speaking candidly about her upbringing, her troubled marriage and her public life.

Some viewers agreed with the tapes being aired, but others called the documentary "sensationalist" and "trashy".

The programme secured Channel 4's highest overnight viewing figures in more than a year.

It was watched by an average audience of 3.5 million and a peak of 4.1 million, according to overnight ratings. These figures include those watching on Channel 4+1 an hour later.

'Betrayal of privacy'

The footage was recorded between 1992 and 1993 by Peter Settelen, a voice coach who was hired by Diana to help her with her public speaking.

The controversial tapes had been criticised by some of Diana's close friends ahead of its television debut.

Rosa Monckton wrote to Channel 4 asking them not to broadcast the tapes. She told the Guardian they were "a betrayal of her privacy and of the family's privacy".

KEVIN LARKIN/AFP/Getty Images Princess Diana in Washington DC, October 4, 1990KEVIN LARKIN/AFP/Getty Images
Viewers praised the documentary but the critics were not too impressed

The critics' verdict

Writing in the Times, Andrew Billen gave the documentary two out of five stars and said that "it was pretentious and trashy."

The Daily Mail's Jan Moir said that she thought Diana would have loved the tapes being broadcast, as it showed her in a "golden light; rueful, amused, heartbreakingly vivacious and beautiful, noble in her obvious loneliness".

But she criticised the narration and music calling it "ridiculous" and "melodramatic".

Mark Lawson wrote in the Guardian: "Despite its faults and opportunism, it has as much right to be shown as the Bashir interview or her sons' ITV documentary".

But Lawson also calls the documentary "manipulative", describing the editing as slick and sly and "constantly telling the audience how to feel".

In the Daily Mirror, Ian Hyland said he was livid after watching the documentary, adding: "That was two hours of my life I will never get back."

TORSTEN BLACKWOOD/AFP/Getty Images Princess Diana in Sydney, Australia in 1996TORSTEN BLACKWOOD/AFP/Getty Images
Viewers were divided on whether the tapes should have been released

'Poignant and beautifully done'

During its broadcast on Sunday night, viewers shared their opinions across social media with many saying how heartbreaking the programme was.

But many others expressed their disdain at the programming - with some calling it exploitative and inappropriate.

The Sun's showbiz reporter Dan Wootton said that there hadn't been anyone more charismatic than Diana.

Allow Twitter content?

This article contains content provided by Twitter. We ask for your permission before anything is loaded, as they may be using cookies and other technologies. You may want to read  and  before accepting. To view this content choose ‘accept and continue’.

Some agreed with the tapes being aired, suggesting that Princess Diana would not have recorded them if she didn't want them to be shown.

Journalist Chrissie Russell was impressed by Channel 4's efforts, tweeting: "I don't think anyone expected that to be so poignant, moving and beautifully done".

Allow Twitter content?

This article contains content provided by Twitter. We ask for your permission before anything is loaded, as they may be using cookies and other technologies. You may want to read  and  before accepting. To view this content choose ‘accept and continue’.
line

Follow us on Facebook, on Twitter @BBCNewsEnts, or on Instagram at bbcnewsents. If you have a story suggestion email [email protected].