Ancient landmarks closed off to walkers, campaigners say

Walkers and history-lovers have no easy way to visit more than a quarter of England's most ancient countryside landmarks because they are on private land with no legal rights of access, according to research by campaigners.

A report by the Right to Roam group has found that more than 5,500 lesser-known sites designated as Scheduled Monuments have no direct footpaths to them or are not on open access land.

The Stone Club, a group for neolithic stone enthusiasts, said its members often had to trespass to access sites.

Government advisors Historic England said landowners were not obliged to open such sites to the public, although many do give permission on a case-by-case basis.

Scheduled monument sites identified by Right to Roam campaigners as having no existing legal rights of way to them include hillforts, holy wells, henges and ancient burial mounds known as barrows.

Scheduled monuments are nationally important archaeological sites, both above and below ground, that have been selected by the government for legal protection in a similar way to 'listed' buildings.

This list of 19,966 is kept and maintained by Historic England.

It includes monuments and sites that can be accessed, ranging from the ancient Avebury henge and stone circles in Wiltshire and the Sutton Hoo burial site in Suffolk to the world's first purpose-built motor racing circuit in Surrey.

But among the 5,500 sites identified by Right to Roam as having no basic legal right of direct public access are the East Kennett long barrow in Wiltshire, a neolithic burial mound first protected as a scheduled monument in 1924, and the Holne Chase Iron Age hill fort in woodland on the edge of Dartmoor in Devon.

While scheduling means a private landowner needs consent to carry out any works to a protected site, it does not affect their ownership nor give the general public any new rights of access beyond existing footpaths.

However, the owners of the East Kennett site told the BBC that they were happy for people to visit with permission, as safety was an issue when horse training took place nearby.

The owner of the Holne Chase site has been approached by the BBC for comment.

The countryside charity CPRE, formerly known as the Campaign to Protect Rural England, said it believed Right to Roam's estimate of sites without a legal right of access was "likely a significant underestimate".

That, it said, was because the report excluded sites that may not have direct access but were within 20m of a road or footpath and could therefore be viewed from a distance, such as the Devil's Arrows stone circle in North Yorkshire.

CPRE president Mary-Ann Ochota said the public should have a legal right of "responsible access" to ancient landmarks as "peering over a fence isn't enough".

Meanwhile, the Country Land and Business Association (CLA), which represents rural landowners, said many of the sites identified "face constant threats - from motorbikes to metal detectors - and are too fragile to survive unchecked access".

"Open them up, and we could lose them forever," its president, Victoria Vyvyan, explained.

She called for more funding for farmers to provide "controlled, guided" access and to better protect scheduled monuments on their land.

Right to Roam campaigner Amy-Jane Beer said ancient sites needed to be accessible as they "connect us with our past and enrich our experience of the countryside".

The group is calling for a change in the law to bring England in line with Scotland where, since 2003, there has existed a right of responsible access to most land.

Matthew Shaw, of the Stone Club, added: "Sites which are visited often have active groups caring for them - maintaining access, ensuring the stones are well looked after and liaising with the landowner."

A spokeswoman for the Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) said the purpose of scheduling monuments was to preserve them for future generations and does not create new rights of public access.

A Historic England spokesman added that it did not require landowners to open their sites to the public.

"While not all are publicly accessible, we can also celebrate a site's history through capturing and sharing information about it," he added.